India's 2% Solution
A friend I worked with in advertising and I were chatting on Facebook. She's working on a couple of projects in India, one of them is an incubator for social innovation that she's been trying to launch. She was telling me she's a little closer because of a new bill enforcing CSR.
Every country has their own distinct culture of corporate responsiblity and philanthropy that generally has its roots in government policy and regulation. India has had a policy of companies investing 2% of their profits into CSR. In February, it moved from a suggestion to a bill.
Some quick online research into Indian sources revealed:
- That the move is seen with distrust by the corporate world of government intervention. J.J. Irani, the former director of Tata Sons, says, “People will find ways to skirt anything that is mandated.”
- Companies don't want to be made to give their profits "to charity."
- A philanthropic organization described it as "mandated corporate social responsibility."
It could be seen as a buisiness opportunity, rather than a punishment. From the government's interest, it's a sustainable way of supporting the social structure of a country that's in an economic boom. For corporate interests, it opens up opportunities for companies experienced in CSR, with proven results of corporate responsibility building brand reputation and bottom line growth, to demonstrate success and lead by example. I expect that the companies in India who have global presence will be the first to know how to build engaged CR strategies that will bring value to both the community and the company.
Brenda
Here's a teaching moment: my 'quick research' involved two India-based blogs commenting on CSR that, on reflection, seem to be referencing each other, not journalism sources. In fact, the bill is up for discussion in parliament but there is such strong corporate resistance, it seems unlikely to pass. It gets almost no coverage from Reuters, who does have a presence in India.
Additionally, CSR is loosely defined in India. Many sources I read, mostly from a year ago, equated CSR with 'giving to charity,' rather than an investment in a company's future.
I thank my well-travelled friend for reading my post and correcting me.
Monday, February 27, 2012 at 10:51AM | |
Email 
